Our Lord speaking to St. Catherine of Siena

They [the homosexuals] not only fail from resisting the weakness [of fallen human nature] .... but they do even worse when they commit the cursed sin against nature. Like the blind and stupid, having dimmed the light of their understanding, they do not recognize the disease and misery in which they find themselves. For this not only causes Me nausea, but is disgusting even to the devils themselves whom these depraved creatures have chosen as their lords.

For Me this sin against nature is so abominable that for it alone five cities were destroyed by virtue of the judgment of My Divine Justice, which could no longer bear their iniquity ....

It is disgusting to the devils not because evil displeases them or because they find pleasure in good, but rather because their nature is angelic and flees upon seeing such a repulsive sin being committed. For while certainly it is the devil that first strikes the sinner with the poisoned arrow of concupiscence, nonetheless when a man actually carries out such a sinful act, the devil goes away.

(St. Catherine of Siena, El diálogo,
in Obras de Santa Catalina de Siena, Madrid: BAC, 1991, p. 292)

www.traditioninaction.org/religious/n010rp_Homosexu…

Pope St. Pius V was a true defender of the faith and a holy pope. He said that homosexual clergy should be deprived of their clerical dignity and put to death:

"That horrible crime, on account of which corrupt and obscene cities were destroyed by fire through divine condemnation, causes us most bitter sorrow and shocks our mind, impelling us to repress such a crime with the greatest possible zeal.

Quite opportunely the Fifth Lateran Council [1512-1517] issued this decree: "Let any member of the clergy caught in that vice against nature, given that the wrath of God falls over the sons of perfidy, be removed from the clerical order or forced to do penance in a monastery" (chap. 4, X, V, 31).

So that the contagion of such a grave offense may not advance with greater audacity by taking advantage of impunity, which is the greatest incitement to sin, and so as to more severely punish the clerics who are guilty of this nefarious crime and who are not frightened by the death of their souls, we determine that they should be handed over to the severity of the secular authority, which enforces civil law.

Therefore, wishing to pursue with greater rigor than we have exerted since the beginning of our pontificate, we establish that any priest or member of the clergy, either secular or regular, who commits such an execrable crime, by force of the present law be deprived of every clerical privilege, of every post, dignity and ecclesiastical benefit, and having been degraded by an ecclesiastical judge, let him be immediately delivered to the secular authority to be put to death, as mandated by law as the fitting punishment for laymen who have sunk into this abyss."

(Constitutionn Horrendum illud scelus, August 30, 1568, in Bullarium Romanum,
Rome: Typographia Reverendae Camerae Apostolicae, Mainardi, 1738, chap. 3, p. 33)

www.traditioninaction.org/religious/n009rp_Homosexu…

More of the Novus Ordo's 'Cult of Man' wickedness! This is disgraceful!
The choreographer of the JMJ (the one who made the bishops dance at world youth day) has been photographed many times on PORNO magazines FOR HOMOSEXUALS!!!

How soon before Pope Francis and these bishops resign?? Please Christ deliver us from these wicked wolves!

radiocristiandad.wordpress.com/…/el-coreografo-d…

The last paragraph is a complete lie. The SSPX didn't 'break away from the Church.' The Novus Ordo broke away from the true faith. The Second Vatican Council is non-dogmatic and non-binding. What is binding is the Council of Trent and the First Vatican Council. Both of these councils have already condemned the new mass, have condemned the very heresies and errors that are within the Second Vatican Council which was not even a Council since it did not define dogma nor did it condemn errors. No legitimate Church Council in History ever did such a thing. What is even more ridiculous about Vatican II is that you had the most brutal, godless system of government (Atheistic Communism) in history and there is not one ANATHEMA against their errors! Can one even say Vatican II was a legitimate council of the Church? We have seen the bad fruits, Vatican II was illegitimate and needs to be anathematized and set on fire in the middle of St. Peter's square along with the bodies of several deceased popes who helped destroy the faith and damn the souls of untold millions.

For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
Foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.

-Romans 1: 25-31

www.drbo.org/chapter/52001.htm

Pope Pius VI, when he condemned the heretical Council of Pestoia, also condemned the new mass 175 years before it was created:

33. The proposition of the synod by which it shows itself eager to remove the cause through which, in part, there has been induced a forget-fulness of the principles relating to the order of the liturgy, "by recalling it (the liturgy) to a greater simplicity of rites, by expressing it in the vernacular language, by uttering it in a loud voice"; as if the present order of the liturgy, received and approved by the Church, had emanated in some part from the forgetfulness of the principles by which it should be regulated,
—rash, offensive to pious ears, insulting to the Church, favorable to the charges of heretics against it.

strobertbellarmine.net/forums/viewtopic.php

digilander.libero.it/magistero/p6auctor.htm

The Council of Constance declared that the Roman Pontiff is bound to the received Rites of the Sacraments:

"Since the Roman pontiff exercises such great power among mortals, it is right that he be bound all the more by the incontrovertible bonds of the faith and by the rites that are to be observed regarding the church's sacraments."

And also, this same Council declared that the Oath of the Roman Pontiff include the following:

"...and I will preserve this faith unchanged to the last dot and will confirm, defend and preach it to the point of death and the shedding of my blood, and likewise I will follow and observe in every way the rite handed down of the ecclesiastical sacraments of the catholic church."

www.papalencyclicals.net/Councils/ecum16.htm

Pope St. Pius V who forbid any new rites that were less than 200 years old:

"Let all everywhere adopt and observe what has been handed down by the Holy Roman Church, the Mother and Teacher of the other churches, and let Masses not be sung or read according to any other formula than that of this Missal published by Us... unless there has prevailed a custom of a similar kind which has been continuously followed for a period of not less than 200 years....This ordinance applies henceforth, now, and forever, throughout all the provinces of the Christian world.....Furthermore, by these presents [this law], in virtue of Our Apostolic authority, We grant and concede in perpetuity that, for the chanting or reading of the Mass in any church whatsoever, this Missal is hereafter to be followed absolutely......Therefore, no one whosoever is permitted to alter this notice of Our permission, statute, ordinance, command, precept, grant, indult, declaration, will, decree, and prohibition. Should know that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul."
-Pope St. Pius V

www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius05/p5quopri.htm

Session 7, Canon 13 of the dogmatic Council of Trent which clearly stated that NO NEW 'Rites' could be created by anyone (this includes the Pope):

CANON XIII.-If any one saith, that the received and approved rites of the Catholic Church, wont to be used in the solemn administration of the sacraments, may be contemned, or without sin be omitted at pleasure by the ministers, or be changed, by every pastor of the churches, into other new ones; let him be anathema.

history.hanover.edu/texts/trent/ct07.html

Infant killing pro-abortion and pro-sodomite 'marriage' catholic (in name only) politicians never get publicly excommunicated for their PUBLIC sins, and horrific crimes of accessory to premeditated murder and sodomy. But if you wish to offer the Traditional Latin Mass and reject the non-dogmatic novelties, errors and material heresies in the Second Vatican Council, well then you are illegally 'excommunicated' and wrongfully called a 'schismatic'. It is truly the bad 'fruits' of Vatican II that we see coming from the cowardly, faithless and forked tongue hierarchy.

I am uploading a talk given by Canon Lawyer, Doctor of Thomistic Theology and former Secretary to Cardinal Stickler, Fr. Gregory Hesse, who discusses whether the Novus Ordo (New Order) Sacraments since the Second Vatican Council are valid or not. He does discuss confession at some point in this talk that I had to divide up into four parts. The link to part one can be found here:

Are the Novus Ordo Sacraments Valid? Part 1 of 4 Fr. Gregory Hesse